Majoritarianism may frequently be the result of the application of evidential decision theory, ignoring all of the non-naturalistic vagueness in the formulations of CDT and EDT, might it not?
Some kinds of majoritarianism, certainly. The confusion is based on mistaking correlation of votes with commonality of interests. “If we can all agree to vote for proposition X, then it must be in our favor, right?”
Majoritarianism may frequently be the result of the application of evidential decision theory, ignoring all of the non-naturalistic vagueness in the formulations of CDT and EDT, might it not?
Some kinds of majoritarianism, certainly. The confusion is based on mistaking correlation of votes with commonality of interests. “If we can all agree to vote for proposition X, then it must be in our favor, right?”