Here, we are performing advocacy for brain preservationists. We call upon the global scientific, medical, and legal communities, as well as local and national governments, to immediately make changes in norms, policy, and laws in end-of-life medicine and care, to allow brain preservation to be accessible as an elective procedure at death, and for this procedure to be regulated so that it is done in a competent, sustainable, and humane way.
Advocacy for ‘immediate’ ‘global’ ‘changes in norms, policy, and laws’ makes this seem entirely performative with little to no substance.
Even if there was an incredibly disciplined world government, that could coordinate every country, focused on delivering such an outcome, would this even have a double digit percentage chance of succeeding?
Advocacy for ‘immediate’ ‘global’ ‘changes in norms, policy, and laws’ makes this seem entirely performative with little to no substance.
Even if there was an incredibly disciplined world government, that could coordinate every country, focused on delivering such an outcome, would this even have a double digit percentage chance of succeeding?
Makes sense