[Question] how should a second version of “rationality: A to Z” look like?

It’s been ten years now since the completion of the sequences by Eliezer, it seems like a good time to look back and rethink a bit.

Eliezer himself said that he did many things wrong, and that the book could be much better.

So, if we made a second version, what ideas/​articles would add/​subtract? what would you rearrange?

I’m thinking of a second version as a handbook of rationality, that doesn’t have to be just Eliezer’s writing (though naturally it would be central), and will include ideas and writing from others as well.

Feel free to get into as much detail as you like.

until we make that second version, maybe this thread can be helpful to new readers to know what’s missing, and what they can do to get even more value out of it.

No comments.