I don’t dispute what you say. I just suggest that the confusing term “in the worst case” be replaced by the more accurate phrase “supposing that the environment is an adversarial superintelligence who can perfectly read all of your mind except bits designated ‘random’”.
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/AAqTP6Q5aeWnoAYr4/?commentId=WJ5hegYjp98C4hcRt