I’d be happy to write up things in the same style, but then journals will just reject my writings, won’t they?
No, because Yvain and Kaj and I will polish it and add the stuff you call “fluff” but I call “explanatory, clarifying, context-setting stuff.”
The only thing is that you and I would have to have enough conversations that I understand what you’re talking about, so I can fill in the inferential gaps and hold the reader’s hand through the explanation.
The only thing is that you and I would have to have enough conversations that I understand what you’re talking about, so I can fill in the inferential gaps and hold the reader’s hand through the explanation.
(This might be premature optimization, but:) I suspect this process would go a lot smoother if you could find someone in the Bay Area to act as a sort of on-site translator, ’cuz long distance back-and-forth is sometimes a hassle. Are there any active decision theory hotshots in the Bay Area?
No, because Yvain and Kaj and I will polish it and add the stuff you call “fluff” but I call “explanatory, clarifying, context-setting stuff.”
The only thing is that you and I would have to have enough conversations that I understand what you’re talking about, so I can fill in the inferential gaps and hold the reader’s hand through the explanation.
(This might be premature optimization, but:) I suspect this process would go a lot smoother if you could find someone in the Bay Area to act as a sort of on-site translator, ’cuz long distance back-and-forth is sometimes a hassle. Are there any active decision theory hotshots in the Bay Area?