Fair. Would you have agreed if I had said something like: “This question has the risk of leading the discussion away from the core insight or innovation of this post.”
I think so? I would definitely had agreed if you said something like “I’m interested in sniffing out potential new paradigms and this might be the beginnings of one even if it isn’t already faster than the current mainstream alternatives.”
We all have different strategies we follow. Arguments that invalidate one don’t invalidate others.
Yes. I didn’t say your questions were wrong; you said my question was wrong.
Fair. Would you have agreed if I had said something like: “This question has the risk of leading the discussion away from the core insight or innovation of this post.”
I think so? I would definitely had agreed if you said something like “I’m interested in sniffing out potential new paradigms and this might be the beginnings of one even if it isn’t already faster than the current mainstream alternatives.”
Thx! Amended.