Let me build on this hypothetical example to explain why she does that:
Bob has clearly done something wrong. Alice is currently in a highly emotional state and recognises that she is likely not able to talk reasonably about what has happened without either becoming very angry or extremely upset and crying.
Therefore she really doesn’t want to talk about it right now.
Bobs insistence on demanding all the answers right now is not helping her highly emotional state and is, in fact, just adding to her feelings of anger and panic… given that clearly he did something wrong, she believes he has no right to currently dominate the timing of when she discusses this highly sensitive issue (whatever it is).
But right now, she is too emotionally fraught even to be able to say that without shouting… so she just blocks.
The best thing for Bob to do is to courteously withdraw for a little while until Alice calms down… then to return at a later date when she’s clearly had some time to reflect… and ask then.
I’ve seen this scenario occur several times where Bob HASN’T done anything wrong. Alice is annoyed for some reason, and is passive aggressively taking it out on Bob, and Bob wants to solve the problem that’s causing them both to suffer.
The assumption that it’s Bobs fault is entirely unjustified from the scenario presented.
What makes you so sure anyone’s playing for power in my scenario?
Bob is attempting to solve a problem that’s causing both Alice and Bob suffering.
Alice may be playing for power, or she may not want to burden Bob with her personal problems, and may be honestly unaware that she’s causing Bob to suffer.
If Alice is being passive-aggressive (as you stated) then she is trying to be manipulative… in this case(as you stated) by causing Bob to suffer when he has (as you stated) done nothing wrong.
She is punishing him for having done nothing. This is a power play, pure and simple.
A non-power play solution to the problem would be for Alice to sit Bob down and explain why she’s so upset, or just to say that she doesn’t want to burden him with her personal problems and can he please stop bothering her about it? or similar…
Therefore she really doesn’t want to talk about it right now.
What if Alice does want to talk about it right now, and is using this to gauge the depth of Bob’s remorse? “Hm, he only asked three times then gave up. I guess he doesn’t really care.”
I never said my own hypothetical was the only way to read it… just offering an alternative viewpoint of what could be happening, to make sure we have more than one hypothesis here.
One should not assume that there is a power play involved… one should not assume that there is not a powerplay involved. One should not assume that Alice wants Bob to stop pestering her… one should not assume that Alice wants Bob to pester her...
One should consider all of these as possibilities… and then figure out which one is actually reality.
I was just offering a possible “inside view” to show that “power play” was not the only feasible option available.
Copying my example from another reply:
Let me build on this hypothetical example to explain why she does that:
Bob has clearly done something wrong. Alice is currently in a highly emotional state and recognises that she is likely not able to talk reasonably about what has happened without either becoming very angry or extremely upset and crying.
Therefore she really doesn’t want to talk about it right now.
Bobs insistence on demanding all the answers right now is not helping her highly emotional state and is, in fact, just adding to her feelings of anger and panic… given that clearly he did something wrong, she believes he has no right to currently dominate the timing of when she discusses this highly sensitive issue (whatever it is).
But right now, she is too emotionally fraught even to be able to say that without shouting… so she just blocks.
The best thing for Bob to do is to courteously withdraw for a little while until Alice calms down… then to return at a later date when she’s clearly had some time to reflect… and ask then.
I’ve seen this scenario occur several times where Bob HASN’T done anything wrong. Alice is annoyed for some reason, and is passive aggressively taking it out on Bob, and Bob wants to solve the problem that’s causing them both to suffer.
The assumption that it’s Bobs fault is entirely unjustified from the scenario presented.
Yes, quite right—in which case it is a power-play, pure and simple.
I just wanted to present an alternative to show that it’s not always so cut and dried.
What makes you so sure anyone’s playing for power in my scenario?
Bob is attempting to solve a problem that’s causing both Alice and Bob suffering.
Alice may be playing for power, or she may not want to burden Bob with her personal problems, and may be honestly unaware that she’s causing Bob to suffer.
passive-aggressive behaviour is a power play.
If Alice is being passive-aggressive (as you stated) then she is trying to be manipulative… in this case(as you stated) by causing Bob to suffer when he has (as you stated) done nothing wrong.
She is punishing him for having done nothing. This is a power play, pure and simple.
A non-power play solution to the problem would be for Alice to sit Bob down and explain why she’s so upset, or just to say that she doesn’t want to burden him with her personal problems and can he please stop bothering her about it? or similar…
What if Alice does want to talk about it right now, and is using this to gauge the depth of Bob’s remorse? “Hm, he only asked three times then gave up. I guess he doesn’t really care.”
Yes, that may also be an alternative reading.
I never said my own hypothetical was the only way to read it… just offering an alternative viewpoint of what could be happening, to make sure we have more than one hypothesis here.
One should not assume that there is a power play involved… one should not assume that there is not a powerplay involved. One should not assume that Alice wants Bob to stop pestering her… one should not assume that Alice wants Bob to pester her...
One should consider all of these as possibilities… and then figure out which one is actually reality.
I was just offering a possible “inside view” to show that “power play” was not the only feasible option available.