Maybe not “need”, but could use as a precaution. Getting located as hypothetical culprits is too close to failure for expected outcome. On the other hand, what alibi given timeturners?
Harry is bound to be a potential culprit in Dumbledore’s mind, since he knows about the Patronus 2.0 and invisibility cloak. Although any alibi that places Harry with Quirrell is liable to increase Dumbledore’s suspicions instead of reducing them, no matter how airtight it seems.
Although any alibi that places Harry with Quirrell is liable to increase Dumbledore’s suspicions instead of reducing them, no matter how airtight it seems.
This would provide an opportunity to have Harry explain conservation of expected evidence to Dumbledore, which is very slight evidence that it’s going to happen (and would make a fun scene, in any case).
Maybe they’re headed straight to Azkaban and they need Mary’s Room as their alibi.
Maybe not “need”, but could use as a precaution. Getting located as hypothetical culprits is too close to failure for expected outcome. On the other hand, what alibi given timeturners?
Harry is bound to be a potential culprit in Dumbledore’s mind, since he knows about the Patronus 2.0 and invisibility cloak. Although any alibi that places Harry with Quirrell is liable to increase Dumbledore’s suspicions instead of reducing them, no matter how airtight it seems.
This would provide an opportunity to have Harry explain conservation of expected evidence to Dumbledore, which is very slight evidence that it’s going to happen (and would make a fun scene, in any case).