You were downvoted, but I think somebody should try to explain exactly why.
Both the idea and the terminology for “sages” is highly questionable. It evokes the idea of mysterious answers and to arguments from authority which are exactly what we would want to avoid.
Could you maybe clarify a bit more what you mean by the word “sage”? It seems like you conflate people who want to solve problems and win with people who want deep insights into the nature of meaning.
I meant in a way that with the progress of more artificial intelligence (Demis Hassabis genuinely belives the fact we can solve all problems of philosophy with intelligence only and no experience). This short post should have stayed a draft so I am sorry for that.
You were downvoted, but I think somebody should try to explain exactly why.
Both the idea and the terminology for “sages” is highly questionable. It evokes the idea of mysterious answers and to arguments from authority which are exactly what we would want to avoid.
Could you maybe clarify a bit more what you mean by the word “sage”? It seems like you conflate people who want to solve problems and win with people who want deep insights into the nature of meaning.
I meant in a way that with the progress of more artificial intelligence (Demis Hassabis genuinely belives the fact we can solve all problems of philosophy with intelligence only and no experience). This short post should have stayed a draft so I am sorry for that.