The problem with trying to type of testing in the real-world is that for it to work you need people who really are trying − 100% good faith—to fight their biases.
Otherwise, you could have very promising tests results showing that people are successfully fighting or routing around their biases, while in fact they are performing that trick just during the testing.
In fact, if such a test was used to determine who would be most deserving of having decision-making powers, the most biases people, favoring one side much more than the other, would have the biggest incentive to try to appear as unbiased as possible while the good faith people might be more honest, disqualifying them.
The problem with trying to type of testing in the real-world is that for it to work you need people who really are trying − 100% good faith—to fight their biases.
Otherwise, you could have very promising tests results showing that people are successfully fighting or routing around their biases, while in fact they are performing that trick just during the testing.
In fact, if such a test was used to determine who would be most deserving of having decision-making powers, the most biases people, favoring one side much more than the other, would have the biggest incentive to try to appear as unbiased as possible while the good faith people might be more honest, disqualifying them.
Or am I missing a way to correct for that?