Was this intended to respond to any particular point, or just a general observation?
I guess this is 70% aimed at Ramana. I find most attempts at “objective definition” unsatisfying qua definitions since they cut out fuzzy intuitive bits that often matter for everyday speech, but that’s less interesting to talk about.
Was this intended to respond to any particular point, or just a general observation?
I guess this is 70% aimed at Ramana. I find most attempts at “objective definition” unsatisfying qua definitions since they cut out fuzzy intuitive bits that often matter for everyday speech, but that’s less interesting to talk about.