I guess this is 70% aimed at Ramana. I find most attempts at “objective definition” unsatisfying qua definitions since they cut out fuzzy intuitive bits that often matter for everyday speech, but that’s less interesting to talk about.
I guess this is 70% aimed at Ramana. I find most attempts at “objective definition” unsatisfying qua definitions since they cut out fuzzy intuitive bits that often matter for everyday speech, but that’s less interesting to talk about.