interesting. So in fact for those adaptations that could be implemented in just 10,000⁄20 = 500 generations are probably more skewed towards rationality.
We can probably see the difference that those 500 generations made by the differences in life outcomes between those with aboriginal Australian DNA and white European DNA.
hmmm well I was actually considering the point purely from an academic POV—it occurred to me that the aboriginals were a near-perfect example. But now that you point it out, I guess that comment could be construed as “in bad taste” or “racist” or something.
interesting. So in fact for those adaptations that could be implemented in just 10,000⁄20 = 500 generations are probably more skewed towards rationality.
We can probably see the difference that those 500 generations made by the differences in life outcomes between those with aboriginal Australian DNA and white European DNA.
Why be needlessly inflammatory?
It provides an test for the theory?
hmmm well I was actually considering the point purely from an academic POV—it occurred to me that the aboriginals were a near-perfect example. But now that you point it out, I guess that comment could be construed as “in bad taste” or “racist” or something.
Cultural differences are hard to factor out, too.