I think if you swapped them, at least at this stage, you would have a bunch of people who accidentally indicated agreement because they thought they were normal voting
Yeah. Normal voting could have been left as is, with two buttons that indicate those two things. If something had an extreme score via voting, but didn’t score strongly (or in the same direction) via the other two, then voting would be capturing something else.
One of the issues with these things (like ‘agree’) - whatever that refers to (i.e. agree with what?), is that the longer, and more parts, a comment has, the less a single score captures that well, for any dimension.
One of the issues with these things (like ‘agree’) - whatever that refers to (i.e. agree with what?), is that the longer, and more parts, a comment has, the less a single score captures that well, for any dimension.
This thread The comments on this post in particular are a great example of this. Lots of people taking pieces of the post and going ‘I disagree with this’ or ‘this is not true’.
I think if you swapped them, at least at this stage, you would have a bunch of people who accidentally indicated agreement because they thought they were normal voting
Yeah. Normal voting could have been left as is, with two buttons that indicate those two things. If something had an extreme score via voting, but didn’t score strongly (or in the same direction) via the other two, then voting would be capturing something else.
One of the issues with these things (like ‘agree’) - whatever that refers to (i.e. agree with what?), is that the longer, and more parts, a comment has, the less a single score captures that well, for any dimension.
This threadThe comments on this post in particular are a great example of this. Lots of people taking pieces of the post and going ‘I disagree with this’ or ‘this is not true’.