Yes, but if someone accidentally picks blue, that’s their own fault. The blue-picker injures only themselves, hence the stability against trembling hands. I would care enough to warn them against doing that, but I’m not going to quixotically join in with that fault, just so that I can die as well.
Sometimes one must cut the Gordian Knot; there is a clear right answer here, some people are bozos and that is out of my control. It is not a good idea to try and empathize with bozos as you will end up doing all sorts of counterproductive things.
There is also a moral dimension of not wanting to encourage perverse behaviour
This game has a stable, dominant NE with max reward, just use that
Sure, if you don’t mind the blue-choosers dying then use the stable NE.
There are no blue-choosers in the stable NE, so no, I don’t mind at all about zero people dying.
Doesn’t “trembling hand” mean it’s a stable equilibrium even if there are?
Yes, but if someone accidentally picks blue, that’s their own fault. The blue-picker injures only themselves, hence the stability against trembling hands. I would care enough to warn them against doing that, but I’m not going to quixotically join in with that fault, just so that I can die as well.
well they literally chose it.… maybe they are suicidal?
Your cognitive empathy skills are sorely lacking.
Sometimes one must cut the Gordian Knot; there is a clear right answer here, some people are bozos and that is out of my control. It is not a good idea to try and empathize with bozos as you will end up doing all sorts of counterproductive things.