A while back, I had a conversation with ChatGPT to try to understand the conservative perspective on trans people and it finally managed to stump me when it justified its claims on the basis of religious morality.
I donât think ChatGPT is good at conservatism. đ AI ethics STRONK.
I imagine this is a similar situationâI donât quite understand how trans women transitioning in part because of autogynephilia is actually relevant for how we should structure society or how one ought to interact with a trans person. After all, cis/âhet people can make big life decisions like marrying a specific person (partly) on the basis of their sexual desire, and everyone seems okay with that. Does the argument go deeper than âautogynephilia bad and standard cishet sexual behavior okay because [gestures vaguely at religion or tradition]â?
After paying closer attention to some conservatives (especially Richard Hanania) for a while, I came up with this model. More recently, Iâve also gotten into intergenerational trauma as a further model of these things. (Roughly: Conservatives see how progressives fight them to introduce a bunch of progressive stuff, they decide that this means progressive stuff is their enemy, so they oppose it.)
I donât think ChatGPT is good at conservatism. đ AI ethics STRONK.
After paying closer attention to some conservatives (especially Richard Hanania) for a while, I came up with this model. More recently, Iâve also gotten into intergenerational trauma as a further model of these things. (Roughly: Conservatives see how progressives fight them to introduce a bunch of progressive stuff, they decide that this means progressive stuff is their enemy, so they oppose it.)