It isn’t exactly what I’m going for. Example use cases I have in mind:
“Here’s a list of projects I’m considering working on, and I’m adding curxes/considerations for each”
“Here’s my new alignment research agenda” (can an AI suggest places where this research is wrong? Seems like checking this would help the Control agenda?)
Seems like just pasting into the chat context / adding as attachments the relevant info on the default Claude web interface would work fine for those use cases.
I want the tool to proactively suggest things while working on the document, optimizing for “low friction for getting lots of comments from the LLM”. The tool you suggested does optimize for this property very well
I met someone in SF doing this but cannot remember the name of the company! If I remember I’ll let you know
One idea I thought would be cool related to this is to have several LLMs with different ‘personalities’ each giving different kinds of feedback. Eg. a ‘critic’, an ‘aesthete’, a ‘layperson’, so just like in Google Docs where you get comments from different people, here you can get inline feedback from different kinds of readers
I’m looking for an AI tool which feels like Google Docs but has an LLM proactively commenting/suggesting things.
(Is anyone else interested in something like this?)
The nearest thing I can think of off the top of my head is the Pantheon interface. Probably more unconventional than what you had in mind, though.
This is very cool, thanks!
I’m tempted to add Claude support
It isn’t exactly what I’m going for. Example use cases I have in mind:
“Here’s a list of projects I’m considering working on, and I’m adding curxes/considerations for each”
“Here’s my new alignment research agenda” (can an AI suggest places where this research is wrong? Seems like checking this would help the Control agenda?)
“Here’s a cost-effectiveness analysis of an org”
Seems like just pasting into the chat context / adding as attachments the relevant info on the default Claude web interface would work fine for those use cases.
I want the tool to proactively suggest things while working on the document, optimizing for “low friction for getting lots of comments from the LLM”. The tool you suggested does optimize for this property very well
I see. Friction management / affordance landscaping is indeed very important for interface UX design.
I met someone in SF doing this but cannot remember the name of the company! If I remember I’ll let you know
One idea I thought would be cool related to this is to have several LLMs with different ‘personalities’ each giving different kinds of feedback. Eg. a ‘critic’, an ‘aesthete’, a ‘layperson’, so just like in Google Docs where you get comments from different people, here you can get inline feedback from different kinds of readers
The Pantheon interface features comments by different LLM personas.