Pinned open threads about recurrent topics. Maybe linked to wikis, or just a selected few. I would like for example to read comments on social norms, but they are spread across many open threads and short form posts.
A mechanism to handle info-hazard. A comment reported has info-hazard could be immediately hidden until a team reviews it. If it’s deemed sufficiently hazardy, the user gets ban or suspended. If it’s not hazardy at all, the reporter gets a warning; after 3 warnings, and a ratio worse than 1 in 2 (or something like that), they get suspended. If it’s hazardy only for a group of people, there should be a warning before the info-hazard.
I haven’t thought about this much, and there could also be downsides too (PM if you want to discuss this more).
Pinned open threads about recurrent topics. Maybe linked to wikis, or just a selected few. I would like for example to read comments on social norms, but they are spread across many open threads and short form posts.
A place to suggest features, hence this question ’^_^
A way to update my username given I changed my name to Mati a while ago :)
Yep, feel free to ping us on Intercom and we will gladly change your username.
thanks, I appreciate! I don’t see Intercom (?). I would like my username to be Mati_Roy
I wonder if you saw Oliver’s reply here?
oh, I had missed that :o thanks for letting me know!
by the way, I often see you link information together, and make sure to follow-up on various things; I really appreciate that!
See the history of Karma changes (now the history disappears, and sometimes I miss it)
Edit: moved to What reacts do you to be able to give to posts? (emoticons, cognicons, and more)
I haven’t thought this through, but more ways to evaluate a post.
Possibly, some of those ways would only be available by some post, depending on whether the poster selected them.
Ex.:
whether (or how much) you agree with a post
if a post will change your actions
your credence on a post
whether you updated from the post
I thought about this because I wanted to know if people would change how they use the term “zero sum” after reading Zero sum is a misnomer
moved
A mechanism to handle info-hazard. A comment reported has info-hazard could be immediately hidden until a team reviews it. If it’s deemed sufficiently hazardy, the user gets ban or suspended. If it’s not hazardy at all, the reporter gets a warning; after 3 warnings, and a ratio worse than 1 in 2 (or something like that), they get suspended. If it’s hazardy only for a group of people, there should be a warning before the info-hazard.
I haven’t thought about this much, and there could also be downsides too (PM if you want to discuss this more).