Well, this was a disaster. Not to whine, but I’m somewhat disappointed that nobody even addressed the content of the post. I honestly thought it was a good idea.
I downvoted on the general principle that I think LessWrong should be reserved for talk of rationality. For what it’s worth I think your AI idea was much better that most (and most get upvoted, so that confuses me). In particular the idea of learning human values from the internet (as opposed to random humans that the AGI has at hand) is a good idea.
Well, this was a disaster. Not to whine, but I’m somewhat disappointed that nobody even addressed the content of the post. I honestly thought it was a good idea.
I downvoted on the general principle that I think LessWrong should be reserved for talk of rationality. For what it’s worth I think your AI idea was much better that most (and most get upvoted, so that confuses me). In particular the idea of learning human values from the internet (as opposed to random humans that the AGI has at hand) is a good idea.
You know, ragequitting is not a fantastic way to endear you to people.
You know, I don’t think the goal of ragequitting is to endear you to people.
Kinda don’t think Ati cares at this point.
The post has gone up to positive karma...