The former gives you a system that fails 20 percent of the time still, the latter halves your error rate.
The former results in the error rate being 2050=40% of the previous one, while the latter in it being 1020=50%, so the former would appear to be a bigger step?
you’re right. I was latched on the fact that with the former case, you still have to babysit a lot, because 1⁄5 times is a lot of errors, while 1⁄10 is starting to approach viability for some tasks.
The former results in the error rate being 2050=40% of the previous one, while the latter in it being 1020=50%, so the former would appear to be a bigger step?
you’re right. I was latched on the fact that with the former case, you still have to babysit a lot, because 1⁄5 times is a lot of errors, while 1⁄10 is starting to approach viability for some tasks.