This time I know better than to interpret your text in a suspicious manner. Sorry for doing that to you in the other thread. FWIW, I liked your suggestion to play rationalist taboo once I understood that it was what you were suggesting. I have woken up to the fact that I interpreted your words suspiciously due to you expressing some unfriendliness toward me. This time, my perspective is that you probably intend to be constructive. I would like to understand what you mean by telling me to “include other” but I don’t. To me, this is a cryptic message. The other one seemed cryptic at first also.
As a poll option, add “other” to whatever list you think of, and then you won’t leave anything out. Maybe “Other—I’ll explain in a comment” if you want to drive those respondents to tell you what you missed.
It feels like I should have been able to get that. If so, sorry for my moment of cluelessness, Alicorn. If not… well, maybe adding a little bit more context to your comments would save some time by reducing confusion. That could help either way.
Include “Other”.
This time I know better than to interpret your text in a suspicious manner. Sorry for doing that to you in the other thread. FWIW, I liked your suggestion to play rationalist taboo once I understood that it was what you were suggesting. I have woken up to the fact that I interpreted your words suspiciously due to you expressing some unfriendliness toward me. This time, my perspective is that you probably intend to be constructive. I would like to understand what you mean by telling me to “include other” but I don’t. To me, this is a cryptic message. The other one seemed cryptic at first also.
As a poll option, add “other” to whatever list you think of, and then you won’t leave anything out. Maybe “Other—I’ll explain in a comment” if you want to drive those respondents to tell you what you missed.
It feels like I should have been able to get that. If so, sorry for my moment of cluelessness, Alicorn. If not… well, maybe adding a little bit more context to your comments would save some time by reducing confusion. That could help either way.