It’s alway an arbitrary set of axioms you starts with. Always. An old axiom of yours can be deleted only if it confronts some others.
Not “arbitrary”, and very much specific and immutable.
If there is a possible set of the fundamental axioms, there is a person who adopts this set. Almost so.
Do you know two people with the same 20 or so identical sets of fundamentals?
A beliefs system of a human is quite an arbitrary one.
I hope you merely mean, “there is a point in mind-space that adopts this set”, and not that there exists or has existed a person who does. Just based on the number of possible axioms, that claim is trivially false; and the vast majority of axioms would be particularly unlikely to be chosen by human beings in particular.
Of course. I thought that was obvious.
The majority of those sets of axioms are not occupied by any human mind. Of course.
I should say “human possible” instead of “possible”.
Not “arbitrary”, and very much specific and immutable.
If there is a possible set of the fundamental axioms, there is a person who adopts this set. Almost so.
Do you know two people with the same 20 or so identical sets of fundamentals?
A beliefs system of a human is quite an arbitrary one.
I hope you merely mean, “there is a point in mind-space that adopts this set”, and not that there exists or has existed a person who does. Just based on the number of possible axioms, that claim is trivially false; and the vast majority of axioms would be particularly unlikely to be chosen by human beings in particular.
Of course. I thought that was obvious.
The majority of those sets of axioms are not occupied by any human mind. Of course.
I should say “human possible” instead of “possible”.