Yes, good point. I’d make the same claim with “doesn’t know about deception” replaced by “hasn’t figured out that deception is a good strategy (assuming deception is a good strategy)”.
Humans who believe in God still haven’t concluded that deception is a good strategy, and they have similar evidence about the non-omnipotence and non-omnibenevolence of God as an AI might have for its creators.
(Though maybe I’m wrong about this claim—maybe if we ask some believers they would tell us “yeah I am just being good to make it to the next life, where hopefully I’ll have a little more power and freedom and can go buck wild.”)
Yes, good point. I’d make the same claim with “doesn’t know about deception” replaced by “hasn’t figured out that deception is a good strategy (assuming deception is a good strategy)”.
Humans who believe in God still haven’t concluded that deception is a good strategy, and they have similar evidence about the non-omnipotence and non-omnibenevolence of God as an AI might have for its creators.
(Though maybe I’m wrong about this claim—maybe if we ask some believers they would tell us “yeah I am just being good to make it to the next life, where hopefully I’ll have a little more power and freedom and can go buck wild.”)