What exactly do you mean by “the technique of solving for equillibrium”? I would’ve said I ‘internalized’ it but you’re making me wonder if I actually have.
Solving for equillibrium is when you analyse the impact of a proposed action by asking what the resulting equillibrium solution looks like. Internalizing it means that you automatically notice when/where to apply this skill and do it without conscious effort. It also includes noticing when a system is already in equillibrium. A side-effect of this is noticing when an equillibrium doesn’t make sense to you, indicating that you’re missing some factor.
What exactly do you mean by “the technique of solving for equillibrium”? I would’ve said I ‘internalized’ it but you’re making me wonder if I actually have.
Solving for equillibrium is when you analyse the impact of a proposed action by asking what the resulting equillibrium solution looks like. Internalizing it means that you automatically notice when/where to apply this skill and do it without conscious effort. It also includes noticing when a system is already in equillibrium. A side-effect of this is noticing when an equillibrium doesn’t make sense to you, indicating that you’re missing some factor.
Oh yes I think I do that all the time. “How will that settle out?” and “How is it staying like this idgi”