For me, your comments are more about ‘debasing language’ than rebasing ethics. Your word choices are distracting. … I feel something like mild moral revulsion to the words, ‘dick’, ‘hookers’ and ‘blow’.
What the ?.. The OP, Shalmanese, didn’t use “dick” in the post, only in a comment, and “hookers” and “blow” were used by someone else. You can find fault with the post on several grounds but “debasing language” seems out of line.
Under the scroll bar on the right hand side of the comment box, you will find a “Help” link that explains how to formulate links. (LessWrong uses Markdown syntax, if you are familiar with that.)
For me, your comments are more about ‘debasing language’ than rebasing ethics. Your word choices are distracting. … I feel something like mild moral revulsion to the words, ‘dick’, ‘hookers’ and ‘blow’.
What the ?.. The OP, Shalmanese, didn’t use “dick” in the post, only in a comment, and “hookers” and “blow” were used by someone else. You can find fault with the post on several grounds but “debasing language” seems out of line.
Not in the original article, but Shalmanese did use those words here and here.
Under the scroll bar on the right hand side of the comment box, you will find a “Help” link that explains how to formulate links. (LessWrong uses Markdown syntax, if you are familiar with that.)