I am a philosopher working mostly on methodology and causal inference, though I also dabble in (new wave) experimental philosophy—not to be confused with the straight-up physics that went by that name from the days of Newton and Boyle until some time in the mid-nineteenth century. ;)
I just finished my PhD (in history and philosophy of science) and started as an assistant professor of philosophy at the University of Illinois in Urbana-Champaign on August 16th.
From time to time over the last two or three years, I’ve glanced at Less Wrong and found it engaging. I am a bit depressed at the pessimism often displayed with respect to contemporary philosophy, but part of that depression is the recognition that the critiques are pretty reasonable. Anyway, I thought I should officially sign on so that I can throw in my two cents and expose my thinking to severe—but, hopefully, courteous—testing.
I am a bit depressed at the pessimism often displayed with respect to contemporary philosophy, but part of that depression is the recognition that the critiques are pretty reasonable.
Don’t worry, 99% of philosophy is crud, but only because 99% of everything is crud. (That doesn’t sound as reassuring as it did in my head. :-) )
Hullo Less Wrongers,
I am a philosopher working mostly on methodology and causal inference, though I also dabble in (new wave) experimental philosophy—not to be confused with the straight-up physics that went by that name from the days of Newton and Boyle until some time in the mid-nineteenth century. ;)
I just finished my PhD (in history and philosophy of science) and started as an assistant professor of philosophy at the University of Illinois in Urbana-Champaign on August 16th.
From time to time over the last two or three years, I’ve glanced at Less Wrong and found it engaging. I am a bit depressed at the pessimism often displayed with respect to contemporary philosophy, but part of that depression is the recognition that the critiques are pretty reasonable. Anyway, I thought I should officially sign on so that I can throw in my two cents and expose my thinking to severe—but, hopefully, courteous—testing.
Welcome!
Don’t worry, 99% of philosophy is crud, but only because 99% of everything is crud. (That doesn’t sound as reassuring as it did in my head. :-) )
Only 99%? That sounds low. ;)
Which 99% are you talking about?