On a related note, in a previous thread I think you said that certain axioms needed to derive Bayesian probability seemed sort of iffy to you. I was wondering, is it possible to connect Bayes’ anthropic weirdness problems to any axioms in particular?
Wow, thanks! I’d never seen that post for some reason. (ETA: Apparently I had in fact seen it and remembered the comments, but not the post… scumbag brain.)
(This is another cool post from 2009 that I didn’t see until a year ago.)
On a related note, in a previous thread I think you said that certain axioms needed to derive Bayesian probability seemed sort of iffy to you. I was wondering, is it possible to connect Bayes’ anthropic weirdness problems to any axioms in particular?
I wrote a post about that. Is it what you’re looking for?
Wow, thanks! I’d never seen that post for some reason. (ETA: Apparently I had in fact seen it and remembered the comments, but not the post… scumbag brain.)
(This is another cool post from 2009 that I didn’t see until a year ago.)
Which paper was linked in the first sentence of that post? The link is broken now.
Thanks, it’s fixed now.