My general impression is for these sorts of things, vagueness is generally positive, since it gives the executive and individual actors who want to make a name for themselves more leeway, and makes companies less able to wriggle out on technicalities. Contrast with vague RSPs, for which the value of vagueness is in the opposite direction.
But of course this is an executive order, so if enough companies aren’t subject to it based on technicalities, it could easily be changed and re-issued. I don’t know how common this is though.
My general impression is for these sorts of things, vagueness is generally positive, since it gives the executive and individual actors who want to make a name for themselves more leeway, and makes companies less able to wriggle out on technicalities. Contrast with vague RSPs, for which the value of vagueness is in the opposite direction.
But of course this is an executive order, so if enough companies aren’t subject to it based on technicalities, it could easily be changed and re-issued. I don’t know how common this is though.