I couldn’t get articles to show ’s either, but the code as posted is equivalent to the code you meant to post, so there is no point (as you can see, you could include them in a comment directly).
The empty newlines make sense before footnotes in your post (maybe just one newline, not two), but would be bad at the end of a post, and I’d make it more compact, like this:
(I’m not sure about the right-alignment thing, maybe left-aligned it would look better.)
There is also “article navigation” LW feature that was intended to do what you describe, and even included parsing of wiki articles that list posts in a sequence, but was never polished enough to become particularly usable. And if sequences are consistently tagged by sequence-identifying tags, it can actually be used, though it’s not prominent enough to be noticed (click “Article Navigation” at the end of a post to access this feature).
I couldn’t get articles to show ’s either, but the code as posted is equivalent to the code you meant to post, so there is no point (as you can see, you could include them in a comment directly).
The empty newlines make sense before footnotes in your post (maybe just one newline, not two), but would be bad at the end of a post, and I’d make it more compact, like this:
(I’m not sure about the right-alignment thing, maybe left-aligned it would look better.)
There is also “article navigation” LW feature that was intended to do what you describe, and even included parsing of wiki articles that list posts in a sequence, but was never polished enough to become particularly usable. And if sequences are consistently tagged by sequence-identifying tags, it can actually be used, though it’s not prominent enough to be noticed (click “Article Navigation” at the end of a post to access this feature).