My choice of words was too confrontational. Substitute “purports”.
What would a real Ravenclaw analysis look like?
I’m not sure. But it probably would supply empirical evidence or cite authorities rather than quoting a friend and referring to one’s own prior writing.
I’m not sure. But it probably would supply empirical evidence or cite authorities rather than quoting a friend and referring to one’s own prior writing.
Why “pretends” to be Ravenclaw? What would a real Ravenclaw analysis look like?
My choice of words was too confrontational. Substitute “purports”.
I’m not sure. But it probably would supply empirical evidence or cite authorities rather than quoting a friend and referring to one’s own prior writing.
Preliminary analysis / throwing ideas out there has a place too. Also, http://lesswrong.com/lw/lx/argument_screens_off_authority/