First of all, thank you for taking the time to write this [I genuinely wish people sent me “walls of text” about actually interesting topics like this all day].
I need to spend more time thinking about what you’ve written here and clearly describing my thoughts, and plan to do this over the next few days now that I’ve gotten a few critical things [ eg this ] in order.
But for now: I’m pretty sure you are missing something critical that could make the thing you are trying to think about seem easier. This thing I think you are missing has to do with the the cleaving of the “centered worlds” concept itself.
Different person, different world. Maybe trees still fall and make sounds without anyone around to hear, physically. But in subjective anthropics, when we’re ranking people by prevalence—Caroline and Prime Intellect don’t perceive the same sound, and they won’t run similar-looking logging operations.
First of all, thank you for taking the time to write this [I genuinely wish people sent me “walls of text” about actually interesting topics like this all day].
I need to spend more time thinking about what you’ve written here and clearly describing my thoughts, and plan to do this over the next few days now that I’ve gotten a few critical things [ eg this ] in order.
But for now: I’m pretty sure you are missing something critical that could make the thing you are trying to think about seem easier. This thing I think you are missing has to do with the the cleaving of the “centered worlds” concept itself.
Different person, different world. Maybe trees still fall and make sounds without anyone around to hear, physically. But in subjective anthropics, when we’re ranking people by prevalence—Caroline and Prime Intellect don’t perceive the same sound, and they won’t run similar-looking logging operations.
Am I making sense?