We all know that a survey is not proof. It was intended as a thought-provoking clue, not as proof. Everyone here is capable of considering whether LW and Hackernews are full of gifted people. This is niggling.
Who said anything about absolute proof? The IQ survey means less than nothing about the respondents’ IQ distribution. Mentioning it at all is a red herring at best.
Who said anything about absolute proof? The IQ survey means less than nothing about the respondents’ IQ distribution.
Less than nothing? I don’t believe you. In fact I don’t even believe you believe you. Not only that the claim doesn’t even make sense. If the ‘meaning’ falls into the negatives that seems to be meaning all of it’s own.
We all know that a survey is not proof. It was intended as a thought-provoking clue, not as proof. Everyone here is capable of considering whether LW and Hackernews are full of gifted people. This is niggling.
Who said anything about absolute proof? The IQ survey means less than nothing about the respondents’ IQ distribution. Mentioning it at all is a red herring at best.
Less than nothing? I don’t believe you. In fact I don’t even believe you believe you. Not only that the claim doesn’t even make sense. If the ‘meaning’ falls into the negatives that seems to be meaning all of it’s own.
I do enjoy a good round of taking someone too literally for comedic value, too.
evidently.