[SEQ RERUN] Trying to Try
Today’s post, Trying to Try was originally published on 01 October 2008. A summary (taken from the LW wiki):
As a human, if you try to try something, you will put much less work into it than if you try something.
Discuss the post here (rather than in the comments to the original post).
This post is part of the Rerunning the Sequences series, where we’ll be going through Eliezer Yudkowsky’s old posts in order so that people who are interested can (re-)read and discuss them. The previous post was The Magnitude of His Own Folly, and you can use the sequence_reruns tag or rss feed to follow the rest of the series.
Sequence reruns are a community-driven effort. You can participate by re-reading the sequence post, discussing it here, posting the next day’s sequence reruns post, or summarizing forthcoming articles on the wiki. Go here for more details, or to have meta discussions about the Rerunning the Sequences series.
The whole post, I kept thinking, “But what’s the difference? What’s it actually look like?” And then I got to this line, and it crystallized. Brutal.
For some reason, I find this post more inspirational than the Yoda’s original.
I’m going to understand Bayes’ Theorum.
I don’t like this post at all.
Nonsense. If someone says “I’m going to flip that switch” they can just as easily be making a prediction as stating an intention. Consider the similar phrases “I’m going to die in three months” or “He’s going to flip that switch.” If you wish to emphasize that something is an intention and not a prediction, your chances are not affected by adding “try to.” Yudkowsky knows this:
In fact that’s nicely put! So what happened that EY suddenly saw Yoda’s ridiculous point? “I am going to remake the world” is cliched bombast. It is just as easy for an ambitious loser to say so as for an ambitious winner. If you want to chastise the utterer of “I’m going to die in three months” for their bad attitude then you are in the company of Deepak Chopra, not Julius Caesar.