If an outcome with infinite utility is presented, then it doesn’t matter how small its probability is: all actions which lead to that outcome will have to dominate the agent’s behavior.
I think that Orthogonality thesis is right only if an agent is certain that an outcome with infinite utility does not exist. And I argue that an agent cannot be certain of that. Do you agree?
I created a separate post for this, we can continue there.
Thanks, sounds reasonable.
But I think I could find irrationality in your opinion if we dug deeper to the same idea mentioned here.
As it is mentioned in Pascal’s Mugging
I think that Orthogonality thesis is right only if an agent is certain that an outcome with infinite utility does not exist. And I argue that an agent cannot be certain of that. Do you agree?
I created a separate post for this, we can continue there.