I think this would be more smooth to understand if you defined what Kegan 3 means before you use the term in this paragraph.
Kegan stages are a complex concept and I don’t think I can do a good job for getting the concept accross by writing a one-paragraph definition.
I’m a bit puzzled that one who read (if meant as “learned”) the sequences would be left at Kegan 4
That’s not the claim I’m making.
You can read the sequences in many different ways and depending on where you start it will have a different outcome. If you read it in a state where you are at Kegan’s stage 4 and have an established paradigm according to which you can reason you get into a situation where you are faced with two competing paradigms. It’s not surprising if that can have the effect of going “There’s not one paradigm that has all the answers, different paradigms have their use at different points in time” and opening up to more different
Kegan stages are a complex concept and I don’t think I can do a good job for getting the concept accross by writing a one-paragraph definition.
That’s not the claim I’m making.
You can read the sequences in many different ways and depending on where you start it will have a different outcome. If you read it in a state where you are at Kegan’s stage 4 and have an established paradigm according to which you can reason you get into a situation where you are faced with two competing paradigms. It’s not surprising if that can have the effect of going “There’s not one paradigm that has all the answers, different paradigms have their use at different points in time” and opening up to more different