Addition: You also should have less text on slide 29, and less text overall on the later slide. It’s too small for an audience to read.
A good rule is 9x9, meaning you have no more than 9 words per line, and 9 lines of text on any slide.
Slide 31 confusing. There are easier, real-world examples you can use for the sunk cost fallacy.
Slides 32 and 33 seem out of place, though that might just be me.
Slide 36: The word “probably” at the end is awkward.
Bayes theorem on slide 40 is far too complicated to explain on one slide. If you want to keep the idea, you’ll have to use numbers or people won’t understand what you’re saying.
Also, I thought this was a pretty good power point! Especially the first 20 slides, and the message of slides 29 and 30.
Addition: You also should have less text on slide 29, and less text overall on the later slide. It’s too small for an audience to read.
A good rule is 9x9, meaning you have no more than 9 words per line, and 9 lines of text on any slide.
Slide 31 confusing. There are easier, real-world examples you can use for the sunk cost fallacy.
Slides 32 and 33 seem out of place, though that might just be me.
Slide 36: The word “probably” at the end is awkward.
Bayes theorem on slide 40 is far too complicated to explain on one slide. If you want to keep the idea, you’ll have to use numbers or people won’t understand what you’re saying.
Also, I thought this was a pretty good power point! Especially the first 20 slides, and the message of slides 29 and 30.