LessWrong is largely about rational debate. This means that when you make a suggestion, you should provide arguments. In this post you haven’t provided an argument for why you consider this way to run a fire drill to be effective.
Sigh. I suppose I haven’t. Can you steelman it for me? (At least in your own mind.) If you can’t, then I suppose this post deserves all the downvotes it has.
Not speaking for Christian here. Personally, I can’t steelman suggestions that have never been defended. I see the point of steelmanning as trying in good faith to build the strongest version of an opposing view, and then criticizing it. However, to do that, I need material! I need the voice of a proponent, I need something stable and sound to argue against.
I don’t want to generate arguments for your idea, since I will probably misrepresenting it and build a strawman out of speculations, even if I work in good faith. This is why I need your voice!
LessWrong is largely about rational debate. This means that when you make a suggestion, you should provide arguments. In this post you haven’t provided an argument for why you consider this way to run a fire drill to be effective.
Sigh. I suppose I haven’t. Can you steelman it for me? (At least in your own mind.) If you can’t, then I suppose this post deserves all the downvotes it has.
Not speaking for Christian here. Personally, I can’t steelman suggestions that have never been defended. I see the point of steelmanning as trying in good faith to build the strongest version of an opposing view, and then criticizing it. However, to do that, I need material! I need the voice of a proponent, I need something stable and sound to argue against.
I don’t want to generate arguments for your idea, since I will probably misrepresenting it and build a strawman out of speculations, even if I work in good faith. This is why I need your voice!