I think fundamentalism is precarious, because it encourages a scientific viewpoint with regards to the faith, which requires ignorance or double-think to be stable. In the absence of either, it implodes.
This GNXP post elaborates well on that point.
Deciding on an appropriate epistomology is a much harder and deeper question
Have you read The Simple Truth?
I think fundamentalism is precarious, because it encourages a scientific viewpoint with regards to the faith, which requires ignorance or double-think to be stable. In the absence of either, it implodes.
This GNXP post elaborates well on that point.
Deciding on an appropriate epistomology is a much harder and deeper question
Have you read The Simple Truth?