I’d be interested in dispassionately examining potential frame controller’s actions and noting whether their actions and justifications just so conveniently happen to always lead to them getting large personal gains at little personal cost, while incurring large costs (especially autonomy) of others.
Sorry, do you mean this is “obviously” true for all humans, or only frame controllers? If the latter, I would consider this form of understanding intents useful Bayesian evidence for someone being a frame controller.
Obviously. It’s interpersonally exploitative cognition.
Sorry, do you mean this is “obviously” true for all humans, or only frame controllers? If the latter, I would consider this form of understanding intents useful Bayesian evidence for someone being a frame controller.
Yeah, I think that’s a good heuristic!