There is an uncertainty if DA valid or not. Around 40 per cent of scientists who analysed it, think that some version of DA is true, and if we treat as a prediction market, it is a 40 per cent bet. So there is a 60 per cent chance that DA is not valid and thus we should continue to work on x-risks prevention.
Also, it is possible to cheat DA, if we precomit to forget our position number in the future (may be via creating enough simulations of early past).
There is an uncertainty if DA valid or not. Around 40 per cent of scientists who analysed it, think that some version of DA is true, and if we treat as a prediction market, it is a 40 per cent bet. So there is a 60 per cent chance that DA is not valid and thus we should continue to work on x-risks prevention.
Also, it is possible to cheat DA, if we precomit to forget our position number in the future (may be via creating enough simulations of early past).