I’m not sure if I buy that the “frequentist” explanations (as in the disease testing example) are best characterized by being frequentist—it seems to me that they are just stating the problem and the data in a more relevant way to the question that’s being asked. Without those extra statements, you have to decode the information down from a more abstract level.
I’m not sure if I buy that the “frequentist” explanations (as in the disease testing example) are best characterized by being frequentist—it seems to me that they are just stating the problem and the data in a more relevant way to the question that’s being asked. Without those extra statements, you have to decode the information down from a more abstract level.