“I hear that you feel strongly about [insert their words], but it’s not clear to me why you feel that way. My preference would be for you to talk about your perspective instead of making factually-structured statements.”
To me that sentence doesn’t look like it passes the Ideological Turing Test.
Huh? Have you seen Valentine’s reply to PDV in this very thread:
I get the impression that there’s something here that matters a lot to you. I can’t yet tell what it is though. It sounds like you feel really unsafe when reading Unreal’s self-reveal, and that you need others to recognize some kind of danger you see in it. If that’s right, then I don’t yet see what the danger you see is, but I’d like to. My preference would be for you to talk about your perspective (“I feel”, “I think”, “When I encounter X, I experience Y”, etc.) instead of making factually-structured statements about “most people”, because I find it easier to understand where you’re coming from if you talk from your perspective.
By the way, Richard’s analogy with chatbots is also spot on. The first chatbot (ELIZA) was inspired by Carl Rogers.
To me that sentence doesn’t look like it passes the Ideological Turing Test.
Huh? Have you seen Valentine’s reply to PDV in this very thread:
By the way, Richard’s analogy with chatbots is also spot on. The first chatbot (ELIZA) was inspired by Carl Rogers.
Exactly. My hypothetical quote was written as a condensation of that very paragraph.