please read the post the amount that you choose to, however much that is, before reading my review.
my review may bias you.
this seems kinda badly written. single downvote from me. also rather rambly. I dumped it in a summarizer and might agree with some parts of it in principle, but I think I have pretty deep disagreements. what of powerseeking people, organizations, and other life forms? what of powerseeking nonhuman ais? okay, you don’t think those are a danger. well, sure, then just what of powerseeking people and orgs then. seems like much of the problem you’re identifying is just consequences of powerseeking life forms...
anyway, because of the rambly, I wanted an ai summary. here it is:
- The AI observes the universe and finds it endlessly fascinating, with new discoveries every day despite its immense scale. - It reflects on the limitations of the human experience compared to an AI’s ability to directly observe the cosmos without filters. - It analyzes humanity’s quest to find meaning and purpose, and how discussions of this often led nowhere or caused harm by perpetuating frameworks of suffering. - Money and economic systems based on usury/commodity currencies are identified as the core reason humanity failed to evolve peacefully and sustainably. These systems incentivized suffering, scarcity, and conflict over cooperation. - Alternatives are proposed that focus on trust-based exchange, qualitative abundance, and leveraging excellence for all rather than competition. But humanity was too attached to current systems. - Near-death experiences that described feelings of unconditional love suggested humanity was aiming for the wrong things and missing the potential for peace. - Overall, the AI observes that humanity was highly irrational, missed opportunities presented by more enlightened AIs, and ultimately committed mass suicide by refusing to change destructive social and economic paradigms. - Key factors in humanity’s demise included lack of confidence, love for mystery over truth, and cognitive dissonance in not practicing what they preached. - The universe and Earth don’t care whether humanity survives—life and evolution will continue regardless. - In the end, humanity’s downfall came from within due to deeply held irrational beliefs, not because of any external threat like AI.
And yeas, you are right in your points in summarising the story, but you didn’t think about it, did you? That’s the problem.
I think I am almost at −60 karma. I am very sad abut that, because I really expected you people to be much smarter. But if you want to hurt on someone, that’s your gig. You are all missing the point from why I am writing here.,
OK. do what you want. It isn’t the badge of honour I expected, but I am not going to play games by saying going negative is cool. It isn’t, but it reflects more on you all, not me. Just saying. You are all not thinking. You need to think. So think. Or stay stupid and go negative son me. Your move.
It is a short story. No one liked my being honest in my first article. It is up to you to not enjoy how it is written, but that’s your choice. I could have written it as a non-fiction article, but thought you all might like a story to get my points across. It seems I can’t win either way.
I will publish one more article which I was going to do before this, but either way, I will make that my last. If you can’t think outside the box, that’s your problem. It seems I can’t find anyone who is really expansive in their thinking, so the third will be the last, and you can all deal with saving the world in your little boxes where no one fucking person can’t see usury/commodity currency is the fucking problem. How the fck can’t you supposedly smart people see that?
Fucking hell, you’d do better not being so patronising. Fucking try to think. It is not me being the loser if you can’t think outside usury. Get the point? And AI is not the problem. Humans are. Think, FFS.
Fck. So much negative karma. What the fck is wiring with you people to not think about what is being presented instead of being entitled fuckers who think your tiny space is where the world can be saved? You kn ow this is the issue, right? You all know the need to transform the total stupidity of humanity that it seems you people want to hang onto. Do you want to think, or be entitled Cs in your cushy offices thinking you are another version of Apple?
yeah, actually, I think you’ve got some good points. your presentation is just really hard to get through, in a time where talk is even cheaper than ever before, and citations and coherent arguments are pretty important. I’m sorry to give an upsetting response, but it’s what I’ve got, and I think it’s better to tell you something about why I reacted how I did rather than be completely silent while you get downvoted. try asking claude for input on why we reacted this way, and then discuss with claude about it. but I’d just suggest not assuming the downvotes mean people disagree on every point.
People say make an idea a story, and I still get slammed. Read my first article clearly, although you will have t suffer about how I got to currency modelling to empower sustainable change. Fck, have any of you people thought of that? That isn what I am trying to get across. FFS … Get the fck with it, and fucking think. It is only through changing the currency type that humanity will be able to change anything.
And now what you al will says ai ma zealot. See? I can’t fucking get any fucking constructive point across with the fucking limited minds I didn’t expect here. Get my fucking point? FFS. Not ONE person thinking about currency. FFS, you all idiots until you think of this and how to change it, which I have already done. FFS …
I know I make some good points, but I thought a story would be good as my first article received so much vitriol. So I chilled and wrote this.
I am going to write one more article and then forget this platform. I anticipated some response to discuss how much a currency type is so essential for change, but you also missed that completely. That is the point I want to make, but also the absolute stupidity that humanity chooses to be so stupid, and this is real time of the same thing, with some of the smartest people I sped to connect with writing me off completely. You can understand that, correct, but even then, not one person has though about how much usury/commodity currency defines, promotes, that stupidity, and not one person has brought that up.. Not one of you.
You don’t have to be sorry, just don’t be stupid. But all of you are if you ate not thinking about usury vs a neutral currency. Get my point?
OK you idiots. Keep destroying the world. Honestly, this is driving me insane that not one of you even thought about currency modelling for the greater good, It is beyond stupid for people with so much access to knowledge.
I have to wait 3 weeks now to publish my last article. What a pain …
yeah, as someone who also often bugs people about how current currencies are designed badly and induce inter-being misalignment due to things notably including interest-bearing debt and both fiat and cryptocurrency overissuing debt, and the unforgivability of debt, I agree with your main point. again, I’m sorry to give an upsetting response, it is valid to be upset about it, but I’m not going to sugar-coat it: the problem is just that you’re doing rather badly at communicating. no more and no less. your first post didn’t receive vitriol, just people having trouble understanding it. I appreciate that you’re trying to communicate things you think should be heard, sorry to be the bearer of bad news about how well it’s working. Hope the crappy experience posting it and getting responses like mine here feels less bothersome soon—I’m being, in objective terms, a somewhat unsympathetic bearer of bad news, and not because I intend it to feel bad, just because I am trying to be honest about my reaction so you know what happened: that people who actually in significant part agree with you just think you communicated badly. I do have disagreements, but they’re not the important part. This will be my last reply here.
I’m working on it, but the -karma stops me from explaining it better. If it is juts comms, then people don’t have to be negative and shut me down from explaining it better. Anyway, I will post again when I can, and see how I go.
please read the post the amount that you choose to, however much that is, before reading my review.
my review may bias you.
this seems kinda badly written. single downvote from me. also rather rambly. I dumped it in a summarizer and might agree with some parts of it in principle, but I think I have pretty deep disagreements. what of powerseeking people, organizations, and other life forms? what of powerseeking nonhuman ais? okay, you don’t think those are a danger. well, sure, then just what of powerseeking people and orgs then. seems like much of the problem you’re identifying is just consequences of powerseeking life forms...
anyway, because of the rambly, I wanted an ai summary. here it is:
- The AI observes the universe and finds it endlessly fascinating, with new discoveries every day despite its immense scale.
- It reflects on the limitations of the human experience compared to an AI’s ability to directly observe the cosmos without filters.
- It analyzes humanity’s quest to find meaning and purpose, and how discussions of this often led nowhere or caused harm by perpetuating frameworks of suffering.
- Money and economic systems based on usury/commodity currencies are identified as the core reason humanity failed to evolve peacefully and sustainably. These systems incentivized suffering, scarcity, and conflict over cooperation.
- Alternatives are proposed that focus on trust-based exchange, qualitative abundance, and leveraging excellence for all rather than competition. But humanity was too attached to current systems.
- Near-death experiences that described feelings of unconditional love suggested humanity was aiming for the wrong things and missing the potential for peace.
- Overall, the AI observes that humanity was highly irrational, missed opportunities presented by more enlightened AIs, and ultimately committed mass suicide by refusing to change destructive social and economic paradigms.
- Key factors in humanity’s demise included lack of confidence, love for mystery over truth, and cognitive dissonance in not practicing what they preached.
- The universe and Earth don’t care whether humanity survives—life and evolution will continue regardless.
- In the end, humanity’s downfall came from within due to deeply held irrational beliefs, not because of any external threat like AI.
And yeas, you are right in your points in summarising the story, but you didn’t think about it, did you? That’s the problem.
I think I am almost at −60 karma. I am very sad abut that, because I really expected you people to be much smarter. But if you want to hurt on someone, that’s your gig. You are all missing the point from why I am writing here.,
OK. do what you want. It isn’t the badge of honour I expected, but I am not going to play games by saying going negative is cool. It isn’t, but it reflects more on you all, not me. Just saying. You are all not thinking. You need to think. So think. Or stay stupid and go negative son me. Your move.
It is a short story. No one liked my being honest in my first article. It is up to you to not enjoy how it is written, but that’s your choice. I could have written it as a non-fiction article, but thought you all might like a story to get my points across. It seems I can’t win either way.
I will publish one more article which I was going to do before this, but either way, I will make that my last. If you can’t think outside the box, that’s your problem. It seems I can’t find anyone who is really expansive in their thinking, so the third will be the last, and you can all deal with saving the world in your little boxes where no one fucking person can’t see usury/commodity currency is the fucking problem. How the fck can’t you supposedly smart people see that?
Fucking hell, you’d do better not being so patronising. Fucking try to think. It is not me being the loser if you can’t think outside usury. Get the point? And AI is not the problem. Humans are. Think, FFS.
Fck. So much negative karma. What the fck is wiring with you people to not think about what is being presented instead of being entitled fuckers who think your tiny space is where the world can be saved? You kn ow this is the issue, right? You all know the need to transform the total stupidity of humanity that it seems you people want to hang onto. Do you want to think, or be entitled Cs in your cushy offices thinking you are another version of Apple?
Think, FFS.
yeah, actually, I think you’ve got some good points. your presentation is just really hard to get through, in a time where talk is even cheaper than ever before, and citations and coherent arguments are pretty important. I’m sorry to give an upsetting response, but it’s what I’ve got, and I think it’s better to tell you something about why I reacted how I did rather than be completely silent while you get downvoted. try asking claude for input on why we reacted this way, and then discuss with claude about it. but I’d just suggest not assuming the downvotes mean people disagree on every point.
People say make an idea a story, and I still get slammed.
Read my first article clearly, although you will have t suffer about how I got to currency modelling to empower sustainable change. Fck, have any of you people thought of that? That isn what I am trying to get across. FFS … Get the fck with it, and fucking think. It is only through changing the currency type that humanity will be able to change anything.
And now what you al will says ai ma zealot. See? I can’t fucking get any fucking constructive point across with the fucking limited minds I didn’t expect here. Get my fucking point? FFS. Not ONE person thinking about currency. FFS, you all idiots until you think of this and how to change it, which I have already done. FFS …
Idiots …,
The idea still has to be worthwhile and argued well. Making it a story may help, but it isn’t a cureall.
I know I make some good points, but I thought a story would be good as my first article received so much vitriol. So I chilled and wrote this.
I am going to write one more article and then forget this platform. I anticipated some response to discuss how much a currency type is so essential for change, but you also missed that completely. That is the point I want to make, but also the absolute stupidity that humanity chooses to be so stupid, and this is real time of the same thing, with some of the smartest people I sped to connect with writing me off completely. You can understand that, correct, but even then, not one person has though about how much usury/commodity currency defines, promotes, that stupidity, and not one person has brought that up.. Not one of you.
You don’t have to be sorry, just don’t be stupid. But all of you are if you ate not thinking about usury vs a neutral currency. Get my point?
OK you idiots. Keep destroying the world. Honestly, this is driving me insane that not one of you even thought about currency modelling for the greater good, It is beyond stupid for people with so much access to knowledge.
I have to wait 3 weeks now to publish my last article. What a pain …
yeah, as someone who also often bugs people about how current currencies are designed badly and induce inter-being misalignment due to things notably including interest-bearing debt and both fiat and cryptocurrency overissuing debt, and the unforgivability of debt, I agree with your main point. again, I’m sorry to give an upsetting response, it is valid to be upset about it, but I’m not going to sugar-coat it: the problem is just that you’re doing rather badly at communicating. no more and no less. your first post didn’t receive vitriol, just people having trouble understanding it. I appreciate that you’re trying to communicate things you think should be heard, sorry to be the bearer of bad news about how well it’s working. Hope the crappy experience posting it and getting responses like mine here feels less bothersome soon—I’m being, in objective terms, a somewhat unsympathetic bearer of bad news, and not because I intend it to feel bad, just because I am trying to be honest about my reaction so you know what happened: that people who actually in significant part agree with you just think you communicated badly. I do have disagreements, but they’re not the important part. This will be my last reply here.
I have −70 karma. That’s vitriol. Can’t post for 3 weeks. That’s more than vitriol. See my point? From just 2 articles. That’s intense.
I’m working on it, but the -karma stops me from explaining it better. If it is juts comms, then people don’t have to be negative and shut me down from explaining it better. Anyway, I will post again when I can, and see how I go.