I know I make some good points, but I thought a story would be good as my first article received so much vitriol. So I chilled and wrote this.
I am going to write one more article and then forget this platform. I anticipated some response to discuss how much a currency type is so essential for change, but you also missed that completely. That is the point I want to make, but also the absolute stupidity that humanity chooses to be so stupid, and this is real time of the same thing, with some of the smartest people I sped to connect with writing me off completely. You can understand that, correct, but even then, not one person has though about how much usury/commodity currency defines, promotes, that stupidity, and not one person has brought that up.. Not one of you.
You don’t have to be sorry, just don’t be stupid. But all of you are if you ate not thinking about usury vs a neutral currency. Get my point?
OK you idiots. Keep destroying the world. Honestly, this is driving me insane that not one of you even thought about currency modelling for the greater good, It is beyond stupid for people with so much access to knowledge.
I have to wait 3 weeks now to publish my last article. What a pain …
yeah, as someone who also often bugs people about how current currencies are designed badly and induce inter-being misalignment due to things notably including interest-bearing debt and both fiat and cryptocurrency overissuing debt, and the unforgivability of debt, I agree with your main point. again, I’m sorry to give an upsetting response, it is valid to be upset about it, but I’m not going to sugar-coat it: the problem is just that you’re doing rather badly at communicating. no more and no less. your first post didn’t receive vitriol, just people having trouble understanding it. I appreciate that you’re trying to communicate things you think should be heard, sorry to be the bearer of bad news about how well it’s working. Hope the crappy experience posting it and getting responses like mine here feels less bothersome soon—I’m being, in objective terms, a somewhat unsympathetic bearer of bad news, and not because I intend it to feel bad, just because I am trying to be honest about my reaction so you know what happened: that people who actually in significant part agree with you just think you communicated badly. I do have disagreements, but they’re not the important part. This will be my last reply here.
I’m working on it, but the -karma stops me from explaining it better. If it is juts comms, then people don’t have to be negative and shut me down from explaining it better. Anyway, I will post again when I can, and see how I go.
I know I make some good points, but I thought a story would be good as my first article received so much vitriol. So I chilled and wrote this.
I am going to write one more article and then forget this platform. I anticipated some response to discuss how much a currency type is so essential for change, but you also missed that completely. That is the point I want to make, but also the absolute stupidity that humanity chooses to be so stupid, and this is real time of the same thing, with some of the smartest people I sped to connect with writing me off completely. You can understand that, correct, but even then, not one person has though about how much usury/commodity currency defines, promotes, that stupidity, and not one person has brought that up.. Not one of you.
You don’t have to be sorry, just don’t be stupid. But all of you are if you ate not thinking about usury vs a neutral currency. Get my point?
OK you idiots. Keep destroying the world. Honestly, this is driving me insane that not one of you even thought about currency modelling for the greater good, It is beyond stupid for people with so much access to knowledge.
I have to wait 3 weeks now to publish my last article. What a pain …
yeah, as someone who also often bugs people about how current currencies are designed badly and induce inter-being misalignment due to things notably including interest-bearing debt and both fiat and cryptocurrency overissuing debt, and the unforgivability of debt, I agree with your main point. again, I’m sorry to give an upsetting response, it is valid to be upset about it, but I’m not going to sugar-coat it: the problem is just that you’re doing rather badly at communicating. no more and no less. your first post didn’t receive vitriol, just people having trouble understanding it. I appreciate that you’re trying to communicate things you think should be heard, sorry to be the bearer of bad news about how well it’s working. Hope the crappy experience posting it and getting responses like mine here feels less bothersome soon—I’m being, in objective terms, a somewhat unsympathetic bearer of bad news, and not because I intend it to feel bad, just because I am trying to be honest about my reaction so you know what happened: that people who actually in significant part agree with you just think you communicated badly. I do have disagreements, but they’re not the important part. This will be my last reply here.
I have −70 karma. That’s vitriol. Can’t post for 3 weeks. That’s more than vitriol. See my point? From just 2 articles. That’s intense.
I’m working on it, but the -karma stops me from explaining it better. If it is juts comms, then people don’t have to be negative and shut me down from explaining it better. Anyway, I will post again when I can, and see how I go.