Puzzle playtesters needed! I’m looking to beta test a whole bunch of puzzles for the Microsoft Puzzle Hunt. I’ve got many types—logic, math, words, uncategorizable, etc. Best done with a friend or 7. PM me for details if you’re interested. Example of (an easier version of) the kinds of puzzles I mean, insofar as any one puzzle could possibly be an example: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BwYx-fx5mJcaa3kxSUFHVjAtVG8xQlZYcHpKS25ZSHhTSTdN
Do note that a large bit in the Fun sequence is dealing with the fact that we still want to have fun when there aren’t enough consequential things to go around.
Not saying puzzles are consequential, or that you can’t have fun doing consequential things, but amused that “difficult and not consequential” is almost enough to describe Fun of the Future.
Puzzle playtesters needed! I’m looking to beta test a whole bunch of puzzles for the Microsoft Puzzle Hunt. I’ve got many types—logic, math, words, uncategorizable, etc. Best done with a friend or 7. PM me for details if you’re interested. Example of (an easier version of) the kinds of puzzles I mean, insofar as any one puzzle could possibly be an example: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BwYx-fx5mJcaa3kxSUFHVjAtVG8xQlZYcHpKS25ZSHhTSTdN
Should “pop slurper” be 10 letters?
Looks like 9 to me. It’s not crazy.
Ah. Found it. Saw a different one that also matched but had 10 letters.
Nerd sniped! Finally solved it though.
Which is why I probably shouldn’t volunteer to playtest for you, sorry.
Why?
Fun.
Doesn’t look that fun. It looks difficult, yet inconsequential.
Do note that a large bit in the Fun sequence is dealing with the fact that we still want to have fun when there aren’t enough consequential things to go around.
Not saying puzzles are consequential, or that you can’t have fun doing consequential things, but amused that “difficult and not consequential” is almost enough to describe Fun of the Future.