Like, if the LessWrong 2.0 meta section is not the correct place to discuss what belongs and doesn’t belong on LessWrong, then I don’t know what to do anymore.
Ah, no, changed “discussion” to “commentary”. Just that one thing. But it was created right after the discussion on the MTG thread, so I figured it was commenting on the same thing.
That prompted my complaint but was not the sole thing I was complaining about; it’s happened on multiple posts I thought were interesting. (Also, gah, getting my tumblr posts linked off-tumblr is weird.)
Let me know if you don’t want me to link your tumblr posts to here, if anything else shows up. Trying to keep the spheres separate seems like a reasonable preference to me.
Relevant commentary in other places (sent to me by Rob Bensinger): https://cptsdcarlosdevil.tumblr.com/post/166729669818/honestly-the-worst-trait-of-lw-20-is-the-tendency
Your linking this here is quite against the spirit of that post’s hashtag ;-)
Like, if the LessWrong 2.0 meta section is not the correct place to discuss what belongs and doesn’t belong on LessWrong, then I don’t know what to do anymore.
Loren ipsum
This comment confuses me. (For clarity’s sake, that is the bio of my tumblr.)
I read it as just a humorous, basically contenless, statement that Conor was amused by your bio.
I don’t understand how to navigate tumblr, is there more than one post there?
Ah, no, changed “discussion” to “commentary”. Just that one thing. But it was created right after the discussion on the MTG thread, so I figured it was commenting on the same thing.
That prompted my complaint but was not the sole thing I was complaining about; it’s happened on multiple posts I thought were interesting. (Also, gah, getting my tumblr posts linked off-tumblr is weird.)
Let me know if you don’t want me to link your tumblr posts to here, if anything else shows up. Trying to keep the spheres separate seems like a reasonable preference to me.