Here and here are two fragments of the picture I linked, expanded but otherwise unaltered, and saved in an uncompressed format. Compression artefacts from the original are clearly visible, but please ignore these and attend only to the overall colours.
Again, this question asks only about your experience of the colours, not any guesses you might make about what you would see if you were there, nor what colours you can convince yourself you might be able to see.
If I didn’t know where these came from and I was doing an XKCD color survey-like thing, I’d call the colors in the first bronze and mauve and those in the latter black and indigo. (I’m not a native English speaker.) I’d call the difference between the two blacks “striking” but not the difference between the two blues, so I picked “Just show me the results”.
Here and here are two fragments of the picture I linked, expanded but otherwise unaltered, and saved in an uncompressed format. Compression artefacts from the original are clearly visible, but please ignore these and attend only to the overall colours.
Again, this question asks only about your experience of the colours, not any guesses you might make about what you would see if you were there, nor what colours you can convince yourself you might be able to see.
[pollid:832]
I wouldn’t go as far as to call it a striking difference, but I perceive the first image’s colours as lighter and more washed out than the second’s.
If I didn’t know where these came from and I was doing an XKCD color survey-like thing, I’d call the colors in the first bronze and mauve and those in the latter black and indigo. (I’m not a native English speaker.) I’d call the difference between the two blacks “striking” but not the difference between the two blues, so I picked “Just show me the results”.