New business model—marketing land vulnerable to climate change or sea level rise specifically to people who want to signal that they don’t believe those things will happen.
Warning: implementing this may cost you one (1) soul.
I believe “vibrant” is a euphemism for has plenty of low-IQ-high-crime sub-populations. In particular I doubt Germans want to live in the Muslim neighborhoods.
Why would it cost you a soul? This is Prediction Markets 101 - people buy and sell possessions that have different values based on predictions of future outcomes based on their belief in those outcomes.
Assuming they follow truth in advertising rules, that is an unironically correct statement. Different cigarettes differ, and I see no reason to believe that advertising can’t help one tobacco company poach customers from another. Some people choose to start smoking as well, and they’re legitimate targets for advertising. Advertising isn’t all about convincing new customers to start your product category at all.
New business model—marketing land vulnerable to climate change or sea level rise specifically to people who want to signal that they don’t believe those things will happen.
Warning: implementing this may cost you one (1) soul.
Why not market housing in “vibrant” and “diverse” neighborhoods to people who are politically supportive of immigration?
Oh wait, we tried that already, and it didn’t work—they all want to live in “safe” places with “good” schools. Bummer.
In Berlin plenty of people want to live in vibrant neighborhoods.
I believe “vibrant” is a euphemism for has plenty of low-IQ-high-crime sub-populations. In particular I doubt Germans want to live in the Muslim neighborhoods.
Berlin Kreuzberg has a high migrant population and is somewhere where people want to live.
Racists are hypocritical. Everyone somehow still surprised by this. Film at 11.
Why would it cost you a soul? This is Prediction Markets 101 - people buy and sell possessions that have different values based on predictions of future outcomes based on their belief in those outcomes.
Sure, and the people on cigarette marketing teams are just informing people to help them make rational choices in the market.
Assuming they follow truth in advertising rules, that is an unironically correct statement. Different cigarettes differ, and I see no reason to believe that advertising can’t help one tobacco company poach customers from another. Some people choose to start smoking as well, and they’re legitimate targets for advertising. Advertising isn’t all about convincing new customers to start your product category at all.