Even the most rational among us believe we have something called a “mind” that is capable of something called “free will” which all feels a bit like magic. We have a sense that our minds can cook up thoughts and ideas on its own, without the benefit of external stimulation. The belief is that we can think ourselves into whatever frame of mind we need. We think we can use our “willpower” to overcome sadness, or focus on what is important, whatever. My view is the opposite. I believe our internal sensation of “mind” is nothing but the end result of external stimulation interacting with our DNA. By my view, we are moist robots and we have five senses that act as our operator interface. To me, it makes no sense to try and think my way to happiness when I can just take my dog for a walk and come back feeling great.
We’ll be a lot happier when we stop believing in magic and start figuring out which types of stimulations create which reactions.
This paper argues that at least one of the following propositions must be true: (1) a happy person is very likely to start believing in magic before reaching an “unhappy” stage; (2) any unhappy person is extremely unlikely to take their dog walking a significant number of times; (3) we are almost certainly living in a stimulation. It follows that the belief that I will one day become an unhappy person who doesn’t walk their dog is false, unless I start believing in magic.
Scott Adams
This paper argues that at least one of the following propositions must be true: (1) a happy person is very likely to start believing in magic before reaching an “unhappy” stage; (2) any unhappy person is extremely unlikely to take their dog walking a significant number of times; (3) we are almost certainly living in a stimulation. It follows that the belief that I will one day become an unhappy person who doesn’t walk their dog is false, unless I start believing in magic.