I try to keep tallies of both wins and mistakes (and maybe a third tally for things I just found interesting), then keep an eye on my relative scores. I reset the counters once one hit ~25 and recalibrate their sensitivity so they’re in range of feeling actionable.
Example: Playing frisbee, I’d keep track of throws that were good enough for the other person to catch (+) or ones they had to run for (-). If numbers came too slowly I’d focus on smaller aspects like good form or trying out variations. If everything counted up too quickly I’d focus on getting a whole sequence (run fast, catch smoothly, do a trick, throw straight) right. If I was too skewed towards one side or the other, I could change focus on just one side or tighten the technicalities of what counted.
Oh, interesting. Keeping track of + and—for the same thing, like frisbee tosses, indicates an obvious third path of “start out assuming average priors and then look for consistent deltas.”
I try to keep tallies of both wins and mistakes (and maybe a third tally for things I just found interesting), then keep an eye on my relative scores. I reset the counters once one hit ~25 and recalibrate their sensitivity so they’re in range of feeling actionable.
Example: Playing frisbee, I’d keep track of throws that were good enough for the other person to catch (+) or ones they had to run for (-).
If numbers came too slowly I’d focus on smaller aspects like good form or trying out variations.
If everything counted up too quickly I’d focus on getting a whole sequence (run fast, catch smoothly, do a trick, throw straight) right.
If I was too skewed towards one side or the other, I could change focus on just one side or tighten the technicalities of what counted.
Oh, interesting. Keeping track of + and—for the same thing, like frisbee tosses, indicates an obvious third path of “start out assuming average priors and then look for consistent deltas.”